The International Monetary Fund (IMF) warned that tokenized assets will remain peripheral unless markets resolve who legally owns them and where settlement is final.
New BeInCrypto research shows why, mapping a $60 billion market fractured across regulatory regimes and largely closed to US retail investors.
Why Legal Clarity Matters For Tokenization’s Future, According to IMF
Tobias Adrian, Financial Counsellor and Director of the IMF’s Monetary and Capital Markets Department, highlighted that tokenization is more than a technology upgrade. He noted that it changes the structure of the financial system itself.
Legal clarity is central to that argument. Adrian said clear rules on ownership, settlement, and jurisdiction will decide whether tokenization moves to the center of finance or stays at its edge.
“Market participants must know whether tokenized records constitute definitive ownership, whether settlement finality is legally recognized, and which jurisdiction’s law applies. Without clarity, tokenization will remain fragmented and peripheral,” Adrian said.
Ownership and Access Split the Market
BeInCrypto’s Real State of Tokenization in 2026 report puts hard numbers behind that concern. It tracked roughly $60 billion in tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) as of May 31, excluding stablecoins and repurchase agreements.
The market splits into several parallel markets rather than one. Regulatory regime, geography, and investor status divide them. About 97% of that value is either inaccessible to US retail investors or carries no retail-grade regulation.
Only $1.7 billion is open to retail buyers, while accredited US investors can access roughly $8.3 billion, including Regulation D products.
Ownership type is also part of the divide. Tokens fall into direct ownership, fund shares, or synthetic exposure. Synthetic structures give price exposure without any claim on the asset.
The distinction is clearest in equities. 59% of all stock tokens by count provide synthetic price exposure rather than actual share ownership, according to the report. Holders track a price but own no shares
Regulatory ambiguity compounds the problem. About 39% of the market lacks an identifiable regulatory framework, a gap the report flags as a due diligence risk for allocators.
Adrian frames the problem in principle. The report shows it in the data. Both point to the same unfinished work on ownership rights and settlement. The open question is whether that infrastructure arrives soon enough.
Source: BeInCrypto
